There Are Many Types of Public Land Ranches

One of the myths used to defend livestock grazing on public lands is that it’s predominated by modest family ranches. But the truth isn’t that simple.

Tribal Public Land Ranches

For example, in Arizona there are 22 Native American tribes and at least six of them hold a U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or Forest Service grazing permit. As shown in the table below, they hold permits for a dozen total grazing allotments that are combined 389,420 acres, or about 608.5 sq. mi. of public land.

Federal grazing regulations include an onerous “use it or lose it” requirement wherein a grazing permit can be revoked if the permittee doesn’t graze enough livestock, so the tribes have to graze their allotments. Earlier this year, however, the Trump administration proposed new BLM regulations that would prohibit tribes from grazing native bison by adding a requirement that only “production oriented” livestock will be permitted on BLM allotments. The proposal explained that, “there is no basis for a different treatment of ‘indigenous’ animals,” and that they were, “seeking to head off suggestions that grazing permits may be appropriate for other purposes, including preservation or conservation.”

It’s sadly ironic that Native Americans are being told how to manage public lands that used to belong to them.

TribeRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Navajo TribeCoconinoNational Forest
Flagstaff Ranger District
Peaks153,000
Navajo Totals1153,000
The Hopi Tribe
(Three Canyon Ranch, LLC)
Hopi Three Canyon RanchApache-Sitgreaves National Forest
Springerville Ranger District
26 Bar33,227
The Hopi Tribe
(Three Canyon Ranch, LLC )
Hopi Three Canyon RanchCoconino National Forest
Flagstaff Ranger District
Pickett Lake/Padre Canyon55,807
The Hopi TribeBLM Safford Field OfficeRelic Point120
Hopi Totals389,154
Havasupai Tribe
(Rain Tank Cattle Co., Inc.)
Gold Trap RanchKaibab National Forest
Williams Ranger District
Partridge Creek24,622
Havasupai Tribe
(Rain Tank Cattle Co., Inc.)
Rain Tank RanchKaibab National Forest
Williams Ranger District
Rain Tank62,600
Havasupai Totals287,222
Yavapai-Apache NationLittle Horse RanchCoconino National Forest
Flagstaff Ranger District
Casner Park/Kelly Seep28,047
Yavapai-Apache NationBald Hill RanchPrescott National Forest
Verde Ranger District
Bald Hill15,711
Yavapai-Apache Totals243,758
Hualapai TribeClay Springs RanchBLM Kingman Field OfficeClay Springs
6,770
Hualapai TribeBLM Kingman Field OfficeHot Springs1,062
Hualapai Totals27,832
Pascua Yaqui TribeLa Tortuga RanchBLM Tucson Field OfficeLa Tortuga7,704
Pascua Yaqui Totals17,704
Yavapai-Prescott Indian TribeQuarter Circle J RanchBLM Hassayampa Field OfficeQuarter Circle J750
Yavapai-Prescott Totals1750
Totals12389,420 acres or 608.5 sq. mi.

Note: The Navajo Nation also owns the biggest ranch in Arizona, the Big Boquillas state land ranch, also called the Diamond A Ranch. The ranch is managed by Cholla Livestock LCC.

Mining Company Public Land Ranches

Arizona mining companies also own several public land ranches. As shown below, they hold permits for 17 grazing allotments that are a combined 161,536 acres, or 252 sq. mi. of public land. The allotments are located near existing mines, and also proposed new mines. The five allotments permitted to Copper Word Inc. are in the area of their proposed Rosemont copper mine in the Santa Rita Mountains. The three allotments permitted to Resolution Copper Mining LLC are near their proposed massive copper mine near Superior. And the Harshaw grazing allotment, permitted to South32 Hermosa Inc., is near their proposed manganese and zinc mine near Patagonia.

Mining companies are typically capital-rich and have deep pockets, so it seems unlikely that they bought these ranches and acquired these grazing permits because they thought they’d make a significant amount of money ranching. They obviously wanted to create buffers and have some control over the surrounding public lands to try and make it easier to expand their mines.

Like all permittees, mining companies have to graze the allotments to keep the permits. Sometimes they create subsidiary companies to manage their ranches, like the Integrity Land & Cattle LLC owned by Resolution Copper. In the meantime, these ranching operations are paying the below-market federal grazing fee of just $1.69 per head per month. That’s offset a bit by the fact that Arizona mining companies haven’t applied for any of the multiple government assistance programs available to ranchers.

CompanyRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Resolution Copper Mining LLCGovernment Spring RanchTonto National Forest
Globe Ranger District
Lyons Fork19,200
Resolution Copper Mining LLCJI RanchTonto National Forest
Globe Ranger District
Devils Canyon25,676
Resolution Copper Mining LLCVictory Cross RanchBLM Tucson Field OfficeVictory Cross3,017
Pinto Valley Mining Corp.JH6 RanchTonto National Forest
Globe Ranger District
Pinto Creek34,170
Freeport McMoran Miami, Inc.Sleeping Beauty RanchTonto National Forest
Globe Ranger District
Sleeping Beauty8,850
Freeport McMoran Miami, Inc.Sleeping Beauty RanchBLM Lower Sonoran Field OfficeLost Gulch2,434
Copper World, Inc.VariousCoronado National Forest
Nogales Ranger District
Debaud
Greaterville
Rosemont
Stone Springs
Thurber
2,773
4,488
9,528
8,709
4,256
South32 Hermosa Inc.
(formerly Arizona Minerals Inc.)
Harshaw RanchCoronado National Forest
Sierra Vista Ranger District
Harshaw8,138
Sierrita Mining & Ranching Co.Twin Buttes RanchBLM Tucson Field OfficeTwin Buttes2,380
Asarco Inc. & Asarco LLCVariousBLM Tucson Field OfficeHidalgo
Sierrita
Sleeping Beauty Mtn.
12,848
2,674
151
Freeport McMoran SaffordLone Star RanchBLM Safford Field OfficeLone Star12,244
Totals17161,536 acres or 252 sq. mi.

Resolution Copper, however, significantly benefited from a temporary state program called the Arizona Post-Wildfire Infrastructure Assistance Program (APWIAP). It was created in 2021 by the Legislature as part of a state wildfire emergency response. They allocated $10 million to help rebuild livestock fences & watering sites on ranches that had been recently damaged by wildfires. Most of the APWIAP grants went to Tonto National Forest ranches affected by the 180,757-acre 2021 Telegraph Fire. The money was intended to supplement the $2.325 million in federal Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) funds that were approved for the same purpose.

As shown below, Resolution Copper directly benefited from two APWIAP grants that totaled $978,540 – one for their JI Ranch and the other for their Victory Cross Ranch. Indirectly, they also benefited from four other APWIAP grants that helped two ranches they acquired after those grants were approved. These six APWIAP grants totaled $2,169,515 – more than 21% of the $10 million APWIAP appropriation.

APWIAP GrantAmountSignedLand Management AgencyGrazing Allotment
APWIAP #21-801*$41,990Before 08/10/22Tonto National Forest Globe Ranger DistrictLyons Fork
APWIAP #21-809*$403,78004/22/22Tonto National Forest Globe Ranger DistrictLyons Fork
APWIAP #21-812*$499,80506/21/22Arizona State Land DepartmentState Grazing Lease #05-000804
(Slash S Ranch)
APWIAP #21-816$490,29004/22/22Tonto National Forest Globe Ranger DistrictDevils Canyon
APWIAP #21-822$488,25001/04/23BLM Tucson Field OfficeVictory Cross
APWIAP #21-830*$245,40006/08/23Tonto National Forest Globe Ranger DistrictLyons Fork
Total for 6 grants$2,169,5152022-2023
* These grants were disbursed before Resolution Cooper Mining LLC acquired the ranches. The Slash S Ranch state lease was acquired in 2024, and the Lyons Fork grazing allotment’s permit was acquired in 2025. 

Large Public Land Ranches

Long-held family ranches with public land grazing permits are becoming increasingly rare in Arizona, as the decades-long drought in the arid Southwest, widely considered to be a permanent aridification, is continually making more ranches unprofitable. Many public ranchers have struggled to survive financially, despite the millions of dollars of drought relief payments provided by the USDA’s Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) and its supplemental Emergency Livestock Relief Program (ELRP).

One result of the situation has been that wealthy people are buying up ranches. For instance, Hal J. Earnhardt III, of the state’s Earnhardt Auto Centers car dealership empire, has been buying up ranches on the Tonto National Forest and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests for the last several years. As shown below, Earnhardt Ranches LLC holds permits for nine Forest Service grazing allotments that are a combined 436,577 acres, or 682 sq. mi. of public land.

His Tonto National Forest ranches alone include 345,807 acres of public land. The Tonto National Forest encompasses 2,873,200 acres, so Earnhardt Ranches LLC is permitted to graze about 12% of the forest.

Earnhardt Ranches
OwnerRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Earnhardt Ranches LLCDiamond Rim RanchTonto National Forest
Payson Ranger District
Diamond Rim
Pine
Christopher Mtn./Ellinwood
Marsh Creek
Bar X
163,749
33,240
28,289
5,236
49,247
Earnhardt Ranches LLCO Bar O RanchTonto National Forest
Tonto Basin Ranger District
Dagger58,177
Earnhardt Ranches LLC2 Bar RanchTonto National Forest
Tonto Basin Ranger District
Schoolhouse7,869
Earnhardt Ranches LLCEarnhardt RanchApache-Sitgreaves National Forest
Lakeside Ranger District
Railroad
Pinyon
88,948
1,822
Totals9436,577 acres or 682 sq. mi.

The Diamond Rim allotment was created in 2018 by combining the Payson Ranger District’s Cross V, Star Valley, Green Valley & Indian Gardens grazing allotments. The Railroad allotment was created in 2017 by the combination of the 6 Carlisle Complex grazing allotments.

There are also out-of-state millionaires that are acquiring large public land ranches in Arizona. Real estate mogul Stan Kroenke owns a couple of them in the southeastern corner of Cochise County. He also owns large public land ranches elsewhere in the western U.S., as reported by ProPublica in December 2025.

Kroenke’s Arizona ranches are different from Earnhardt’s because they also hold BLM grazing permits, along with a couple of associated state grazing leases. The 10 federal grazing allotments permitted to Geronimo El Coronado Ranches Holdings, LLC and Geronimo Ranch LLC  include 49,598 acres, or 77.5 sq. mi. of public land.

Kroenke Ranches
OwnerRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Geronimo El Coronado Ranches Holdings, LLCEl Coronado RanchCoronado National Forest
Douglas Ranger District
Barboot
Big Bend
Turkey Creek
11,002
8,254
13,449
Geronimo El Coronado Ranches Holdings, LLCEl Coronado RanchBLM Safford Field Office Roger Riggs424
Geronimo Ranch LLCGeronimo RanchCoronado National Forest
Douglas Ranger District
Deer Creek (NM)*
Graves
Skeleton/Fairchild
Outlaw Mountain
4,863
471
7,037
2,178
Geronimo Ranch LLCGeronimo RanchBLM Safford Field OfficeBen Snure560
Geronimo Ranch LLCGeronimo RanchBLM Las Cruces District OfficeDeer Creek Lease (NM)*1,360
Totals1049,598 acres or 77.5 sq. mi.
* The Douglas Ranger District’s Deer Creek grazing allotment is located just across the state in the New Mexico Bootheel. It’s associated with the New Mexico BLM’s Deer Creek Lease grazing allotment.

Kroenke’s and Earnhardt’s ranches haven’t taken advantage of the government assistance programs for ranchers, except for a couple of Arizona Game & Fish Department (AGFD) Habitat Partnership Committee (HPC) grants that Earnhardt recently received. But they are still getting the benefit of paying the below-market federal grazing fee of just $1.69 per animal per month.

There are, however, many large Arizona public land ranches that have received large amount of government assistance, such as the Francis Creek and Crozier Canyon ranches, owned by Clay & Sandra Overson.

The 16 federal grazing allotments permitted to Francis Creek Ranch LLC and Crozier Canyon LLC  include 467,464 acres, or 730.4 sq. mi. of public land. All of the grazing allotments are BLM allotments, and there are at least three associated state grazing leases.

Overson Ranches
OwnerRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Francis Creek Ranch LLCFrancis Creek RanchBLM Kingman Field Office Francis Creek
Big Sandy
Bagdad
Gray Wash
Greenwood Peak Community
Groom Peak
Byner
Cane Springs Wash
Diamond Joe
Los Molinos
Sandy
112,968
64,913
26,378
8,896
36,180
5,476
1,287
2,310
16,223
17,600
1,524
Crozier Canyon LLCCrozier Canyon RanchBLM Kingman Field Office Crozier Canyon106,175
Francis Creek Ranch LLCBLM Hassayampa Field OfficeBo Nine
Desert Hills
Desert Hills Lease
Loma Linda
18,350
5,911
10,322
32,951
Totals16467,464 acres or 730.4 sq. mi.

The tables below show the amounts of government assistance that have benefited these ranches.

Government Assistance Programs Key
  • AALB – Mexican Wolf Depredation Compensation, Arizona Livestock Loss Board (federal/state)
  • AWPF – Arizona Water Protection Fund, Arizona Water Protection Fund Commission (state)
  • ECP – Emergency Conservation Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • ELRP – Emergency Livestock Relief Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • EQIP – Environmental Quality Incentives Program, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (federal)
    The EQIP program absorbed the NRCS Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) after 2014.
  • HPC – Habitat Partnership Committee, Arizona Game & Fish Commission (state)
  • Heritage Fund – Arizona Game & Fish Department Heritage Fund, Arizona Game & Fish Department (state)
  • LCCGP – Livestock & Crop Conservation Program, Arizona Department of Agriculture (state)
    Note: Open Space Reserve (OSR) grants became LCCGP Grants after 2002.
  • LFP – Livestock Forage Disaster Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • LOFFAP – Livestock Operator Fire & Flood Assistance Program, Arizona Department of Agriculture (state)
  • LRP – Landowner Relations Program, Arizona Game & Fish Department (state)
  • PFWP – Partners for Fish Wildlife Program, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (federal)
  • WQIG – Water Quality Improvement Grant, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (federal/state)
    Note: These nonpoint source (NPS) water pollution prevention grants were previously called Section 319 grants.
Francis Creek RanchCrozier Canyon Ranch
Francis Creek Ranch (Francis Creek Ranch, LLC) - Francis Creek, Big Sandy, Bagdad, Gray Wash, Greenwood Peak Community, Groom Peak, Byner, Cane Springs Wash, Diamond Joe, Los Molinos, Sandy & Loma Linda, Desert Hills, Desert Hills Lease, Bo Nine Allotments, State Lease #05-003387, #05-003173
YEARSPROGRAMAMOUNTPROJECT NAME
2008-2017EQIP$713,235
2011LCCGP #11-57$50,790Windmill & Solar Water Pump
2012Heritage Fund$80,000Public Access for 7 Years
2015HPC #14-301*$56,200Kill Coyotes & Mtn. Lions to Protect Mule Deer Fawns
2015-2021LFP$541,847
2019Heritage Fund$100,000Public Access for 5 Years
2022EQIP$64,210
2022LFP$153,539
2022-2023ELRP$156,251
2023LFP$82,081
2024AWPF #2401*$229,698Replace Old Livestock Water Tanks
2024LFP$1,808
2025ELRP$140,363
2025LFP$235,750
2025EQIP$63,829
$2,669,601TOTAL 2008 - 2025
Crozier Canyon Ranch (Crozier Canyon LLC) - Crozier Canyon Allotment, State Lease #05-121813
YEARSPROGRAMAMOUNTPROJECT NAME
2009LCCGP #09-87$33,150Water Pipeline
2020-2022LFP$351,580
2022EQIP$55,630
2022Heritage Fund$7,855Solar Water Well Pumps
2022-2023ELRP$103,224
2023LFP$32,458
2024AWPF #2401*$229,698Replace Old Livestock Water Tanks
2024Heritage Fund$50,000Public Access for 5 Years
2025ELRP$55,626
2025LFP$233,020
2026HPC #25-303$150,000Remove Juniper Trees
$1,302,241TOTAL 2009 - 2026

* This was shared with neighboring ranches.

The CO Bar Ranch, managed by Babbitt Ranches LLC, is another large public land ranch that has significantly benefited from government assistance. Its four federal grazing allotments include 128,438 acres, or 200.7 sq. mi. of public land.
Babbitt Ranches
OwnerRanch NameFederal AgencyGrazing AllotmentsReported Public Acres
Babbitt Ranches LLCCO Bar RanchCoconino National Forest
Flagstaff Ranger District
Slate Mountain
Wild Bill
46,115
26,327
Babbitt Ranches LLCCO Bar RanchKaibab National Forest
Williams Ranger District
Moqui55,250
Babbitt Ranches LLCCO Bar RanchBLM Hassayampa Field Office CO Bar 746
Totals4128,438 acres or 200.7 sq. mi.
The CO Bar Ranch is also a good example of how Arizona State Land Department grazing leases can expand a ranching operation’s impact beyond public lands because, in addition to federal grazing permits, it holds an associated state grazing lease that includes 131,315 acres of state land. (The state land grazing fee is $3.82 per head per month.)
Babbitt Ranches LLC also manages the nearby Espee Ranch, which doesn’t hold any federal grazing permits, but has a state grazing lease that includes 42,054 acres of state land. And the parent company of Babbitt Ranches LLC, CO Bar Inc., also manages the nearby Cataract Ranch through its subsidiary Cataract Natural Reserve Land LLC. The Cataract Ranch also holds no grazing permits, but holds a state grazing lease that includes 130,342 acres of state land. The combined federal and state acreage controlled by the three Babbitt Ranches is 432,149 acres, or 675 sq. mi.
Much of these state grazing lease lands are a checkerboarded mix of private and state land parcels. Their complicated property boundaries have led to the Arizona Game & Fish Department making Heritage Fund ranch agreements for these three ranches to pay for public access. These payments have totaled at least $1.85 million. (Wyoming has a corner crossing law, wherein people can step directly from one parcel of public land to another at a shared corner without physically stepping on or touching the adjacent private land. Arizona state land can be visited, like public land, by obtaining a recreational permit from the State Land Department.)

The tables below show all of the recent government assistance, including the Heritage Fund public access payments, that have benefited the three Babbitt Ranches.

Government Assistance Programs Key
  • AALB – Mexican Wolf Depredation Compensation, Arizona Livestock Loss Board (federal/state)
  • AWPF – Arizona Water Protection Fund, Arizona Water Protection Fund Commission (state)
  • ECP – Emergency Conservation Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • ELRP – Emergency Livestock Relief Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • EQIP – Environmental Quality Incentives Program, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (federal)
    The EQIP program absorbed the NRCS Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) after 2014.
  • HPC – Habitat Partnership Committee, Arizona Game & Fish Commission (state)
  • Heritage Fund – Arizona Game & Fish Department Heritage Fund, Arizona Game & Fish Department (state)
  • LCCGP – Livestock & Crop Conservation Program, Arizona Department of Agriculture (state)
    Note: Open Space Reserve (OSR) grants became LCCGP Grants after 2002.
  • LFP – Livestock Forage Disaster Program, USDA Farm Service Agency (federal)
  • LOFFAP – Livestock Operator Fire & Flood Assistance Program, Arizona Department of Agriculture (state)
  • LRP – Landowner Relations Program, Arizona Game & Fish Department (state)
  • PFWP – Partners for Fish Wildlife Program, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (federal)
  • WQIG – Water Quality Improvement Grant, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (federal/state)
    Note: These nonpoint source (NPS) water pollution prevention grants were previously called Section 319 grants.
CO Bar RanchEspee RanchCataract Ranch
CO Bar Ranch (Babbitt Ranches LLC) - Slate Mtn. & Wild Bill (Coconino NF), Moqui (Kaibab NF) & CO Bar (BLM) Allotments, State Lease #05-000252
YEARSPROGRAMAMOUNTPROJECT NAME
2005LCCGP #05-26$150,000Grassland Restoration
2007LCCGP #07-02$125,000Grassland Restoration
2007WHIP$70,124
2009-2017PFWP$199,950
2009LCCGP #09-29$125,000Grassland Restoration
2009HPC #08-203$50,000Grassland Restoration
2010Heritage Fund$50,000 Public Access to the CO Bar Ranch, Espee Ranch, and Cataract Ranch
2011LCCGP #11-02$125,000Cut Down Juniper Trees & Dirt Tank Cleanouts
2013LRP$100,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2013HPC #12-202$40,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2015Heritage Fund$600,000Public Access for 10 Years - agreement included $200,000 for the Espee Ranch
2018HPC #17-202$30,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2018-2021LFP$382,764
2021Heritage Fund$160,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2021HPC #20-207*$50,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2022Heritage Fund$20,000Remove Pinyon Pine and Juniper Trees
2022-2023ELRP$156,250
2023LFP$98,938
2024LFP$82,785
2025HPC #24-208$194,000Remove Juniper Trees
2025Heritage Fund$600,000Public Access for 10 Years
2025ELRP$40,685
2025LFP$79,252
$3,529,748TOTAL 2005 - 2025
Espee Ranch (Babbitt Ranches LLC) - State Lease #05-000822
YEARSPROGRAMAMOUNTPROJECT NAME
2015Heritage Fund$200,000Public Access for 10 Years - agreement included $600,00 for the CO Bar Ranch
2025Heritage Fund$200,000Public Access for 10 Years
$400,0002015 -2025
Cataract Ranch (Cataract Natural Reserve Land, LLC) - State Lease #05-000216
YEARSPROGRAMAMOUNTPROJECT NAME
2015Heritage Fund$200,000Public Access for 10 Years
2018-2021LFP$414,811
2022ELRP$125,000
$739,811TOTAL 2015 - 2022

* This project was shared with Hat grazing allotment on the nearby Kaibab National Forest.
Some of the government assistance listed above for the CO Bar Ranch may have benefited the Espee Ranch.

Facts Matter

The ranches highlighted above were selected for being real world examples of the wide variety of Arizona public land ranches. But they are not unique, and there are plenty of other ranches that could tell revelatory stories.

Public land grazing is a quasi-feudal, byzantine government institution that deserves scrutiny, not slick talking points. But it’s difficult for the public to get past the myths and obtain the facts, and that’s intentional. One of the biggest obstacles has been federal land managers that don’t want to release public information. In fact, for several years the Forest Service’s Southwestern Region required that grazing permittee names be redacted from livestock management documents before they were released in response to Freed of Information Act (FOAI) requests. That didn’t change until a 2024 FOIA appeal response directed that grazing permittee names should not be redacted – only their personal information.

But even after that, there continued to be some agency resistance. For example, annual operating instructions (AOIs) for grazing allotments are the most numerous of Forest Service grazing records. Some Arizona national forests began posting unredacted AOIs to their websites after the 2024 FOIA appeal response. But others revised the format of their AOIs so that they didn’t include permittee names.

The American public is, of course, entitled to know who holds grazing permits for public land, in addition to learning more details about ongoing livestock management. Fortunately, recent FOIA requests submitted to the Forest Service by Western Watersheds Project have resulted in the release of the names of all current Arizona national forest grazing permittees, along with thousands of AOIs, and hundreds of grazing allotment management plans (AMPs). These important public records have been posted to the Arizona Public Land Grazing Document Library. But the Coronado and Tonto national forests still have never posted any of these documents to their websites.

As previously mentioned, the Trump administration has proposed regressive new BLM grazing regulations. And they previously had the BLM and Forest Service sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to promote more livestock grazing on public lands. It included a provision to try and initiate grazing on all vacant grazing allotments.

These are signs of desperation, because they know that if more Americans obtain factual information about pubic land livestock grazing their house of cards will fall to reforms.

4 thoughts on “There Are Many Types of Public Land Ranches

  1. I didn’t read this thoroughly, but something I didn’t see is how many foreign entities have permits (public moneys going to wealthy foreign people or businesses)

  2. The worst issue is that the public lands grazing leases are not managed at all. Due to severe drought the leases are overgrazed and now being taken over by invasive species. In addition the “ranchers” in our area intentionally overstock and lure cattle onto private properties…willful tresspass. No agency, the county etc…will enforce the laws. Most locals do not understand fence out laws and are brainwashed to believe the that they have to fence out the cattle. There are many federal, state and local laws that protect private property rights that fall under the fence out catagory. Folks need to get educated, know the truth and start batteling with unethical ranching practices. BTW what other business has the “right” to use and damage your private property even as you pay taxes that supplement their business. The whole ranching system is antiquated and corrupt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.